Within 'Dancing in the Distraction Factory', by Andrew Goodwin, it looks into the definitive critical study of music television, with close studies of the emergence and growth of MTV. Andrew Goodwin raises many issues to do with conflicting theories surrounding Music Television criticism and the problems with using classic realist criteria.
Within his book he gives some really nice insight to the music industry. he even goes into explaining how "There is a relationship between the lyrics and the visuals, with the visual either illustrating, amplifying or contradicting the lyrics" and even similarly explains that "There is a relationship between the music and the visuals, with the visuals either illustrating, amplifying or contradicting the music"
But what I learn from 'Dancing is how there is 'Narrative music video' (a story to a song, as shown in the hyperlink), 'Live Music video' (where the band just plays and turn that into a music video, as shown in the hyperlink), Or bands can even attempt to do both. This is then magnified by how "Different genre music videos may have specific iconic and typical specific music video styles." (Example: Guns 'n' Roses - Sweet child O' Mine - This would be a live video)
Within music videos this quote, "There is a demand on the part of the record company that there are enough close ups of the artist or lead singer", helps to show how I'm suppose to present my main singer within my own music video.
With what I have taken in from Andrew Goodwin's book helped me produce the idea that the artist can develop their own style of iconography, (meaning the identification, description, and the interpretation of the content of images), in and out of their video, to create their own style iconography. And often with woman artists there is reference to voyeurism which is a sexual manner, leading to more popularity.
For more information on Andrew Goodwin, it can be found here